Brief Notes on Lewis Henry Morgan

 

 

Lewis Henry Morgan (1818-1881) was an upstate New York railroad lawyer, state legislator, and independent scholar with no connection to museums or universities (he was at one point offered a post at Cornell College but declined).  Morgan graduated in 1840 at age 22 from Union College, moved to Rochester and began to practice law in 1844.  He and some friends organized a social and literary club that they called the Grand Order of Iroquois.  As one of the leaders, and club constitutionalist, he undertook inquiries into the organizational features of League of the Iroquois.  In the course of this, he met Ely Parker an educated and later prominent member of the Seneca tribe.

 

He corresponded widely, collected and synthesized reports, but also traveled extensively.  He developed an abiding interest in the Iroquois and an activist on their behalf (he was made an honorary member of the Seneca nation), and his first major volume was on the Iroquoisc Morgan earned sufficient money from his law practice to retire in the 1860s and devote his full time to scholarship.  Morgan was elected president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1879, two years before his death.  He left a large part of his trust to found a college for women at the University of Rochester (no doubt in honor of his two daughters, who died of scarlet fever while he was on a research trip in the American West in 1858, and whose loss he mourned for the rest of his life).

 

One can divide and relate his scholarship in terms of the three of his major works that relate most directly to anthropology (A, C, and D below):

 

A. League of the Ho-de'-no-sau-nee, or Iroquois.  (Rochester: Sage & Brother, 1851)

 

Five (and later, six) tribes ("nations") were confederated as the League of the Iroquois. Morgan announces in the dedication that his research was done in collaboration with Ely Parker.  There are three aspects of the book to note:

 

 

 

 

On the Iroquois:  "Before the American Revolution, a loose native confederation known as the "Six Nations" lived south of Lake Ontario and east of Lake Erie, within the territory claimed by the colony of New York.  From east to west, the Six Nations were the Mohawk (in the Mohawk valley), the Oneida and Tuscarora (both south of Lake Oneida), the Cayuga and Onondaga (in the Finger Lakes region), and the especially numerous Seneca (in the Genesee, Allegheny, and Niagara valleys).  Culturally similar, they spoke similar languages belonging to the Iroquoian family; they occupied villages that mixed a few traditional bark-roofed long-houses with many compact log cabins.  They lived by a seasonal round of hunting, fishing, gathering, and horticulture (raising the trinity of maize, beans, and squashes).  Their villages were modest in size—rarely inhabited by more than 300 people—and their population totaled about 9,000 on the eve of the American Revolution."

 

 

B.  The American Beaver and His Works (1868)  

 

Thomas Trautmann c

 

C.  Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family (1871)

 

Morgan discovered in 1858 that Ojibway Indians in Wisconsin and upper Michigan had a way of naming kin that was formally similar to Iroquois, although descent was patrilineal.  This set him off corresponding, collecting, traveling through the West.  He published his results in 1871 in a mammoth volume that was an influential demonstration that the customs of designating relatives have scientific significance and that remains important for the data on terminological systems.  He argued for a distinction between descriptive and classificatory systems.

 

Morgan began thinking about this in evolutionary terms, proposing a gMalayanh terminology (in which M and F = M/MB) evolved into an Iroquoian terminology that distinguished cross-cousins

 

Continue [Trautmann's book is a biography of this book (rather than of Morgan himself)]

Use Schneider's comments in 1968 volume (in Morgan file) on the descriptive and classificatory distinction as he applied it first to Iroquois and then modified it herec  Also note Rivers' modifications to Morgan's distinction

 

I.          Promiscuous Intercourse.

II.          The Intermarriage or Cohabitation of Brothers and Sisters.

III.         The Communal Family.  (First Stage of the Family.)

IV.        The Hawaiian Custom.  Giving

V.         The Malayan form of the Classificatory System of Relationship.

VI.        The Tribal Organization.  Giving

VII.       The Turanian and Ganowánian System of Relationship.

VIII.       Marriage between Single Paris.  Giving

IX.        The Barbarian Family.  (second Stage of the Family.)

X.         Polygamy.  Giving

XI.        The Patriarchal Family.  (Third Stage of the Family.)

XII.       Polyandria.

XIII.       The Rise of Property with the Settlement of Lineal Succession to Estates.  Giving

XIV.      The Civilized Family.  (Fourth and Ultimate Stage of the Family.)  Producing

XV.       The Overthrow of the Classificatory System of Relationship, and the Substitution of the Descriptive.

 

This evolutionary development of terminologies indexed not a straightforward social differentiation but rather moral improvement, as the original state of "promiscuous intercourse" is progressively circumscribed by marriage restraints.

 

D.  Ancient Society, or Researches in the lines of Human Progress From Savagery Through barbarism to Civilization (1877)

 

This was his third and most ambitious major ethnological project, relating kinship terms and family forms in developmental stages correlated to technology and political institutions.  Morgan owed much to the jurist Sir Henry Maine, who found two revolutions in the developmental trajectory of Indo-European societies: from status to contract, and from political organization based on kinship to organization based on "contiguity.  Morgan conceived human progress as three broad stages (Savagery, Barbarism, and Civilization), the first two of which were each subdivided into three periods.  Each ethnical period is, in Morgan's words, a "distinct culture."  He saw progress as uniform across world because human endowments are similar.  New forms of behavior, social structure, and ideas originate as inventions and discoveries, and those societies which lag behind were more or less isolated from the diffusion of innovations.

 

Among those who were much influenced by Morgan's Ancient Society were Major John Wesley Powell.  Originally a geologist, he traveled widely in the 1860s, writing sympathetic ethnographic accounts of Native American groups at a moment when the American West was a war zone.  He, James Owen, James Moody and others produced an important corpus of studies about Native American political organization.  In 1879 he helped found and then directed the Bureau of American Ethnology. 

 

Marx and Engels studied copies of Ancient Society that had been brought privately to England.  Engels wrote a lengthy commentary, using Morgan, on the origins of the family and property.  This was later picked up by Leslie White, who tried mightily to resurrect Morgan's work among American anthropology and by Marvin Harris (in his formulations of cultural materialism).

 

 

E.  Houses and House-Life of the American Aborigines (1881)

 

 

ADD references:

 

Leslie White

Thomas R. Trautmann

Tooker, Elizabeth

  1978 The League of the Iroquois: its history, politics, and ritual. In Northeast, edited by Tooker, Elizabeth and Trigger, Bruce G. Pp. 418-441.  Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press

  1992 "Lewis H. Morgan and his contemporaries," American Anthropologist 94 (2): 357-375.

 

William Fenton

 

 

 

A note on Ely Samuel Parker

 

source: http://www.lib.rochester.edu/RBK/PARKER.HTM

 

Ely Samuel Parker was born a member of the Seneca Indian tribe in 1828; his first tribal name was Hasanowanda (gThe Readerh).  His family had originally adopted the Parker name for use when dealing with the white settlers in the area.  His father was a Tonawanda Seneca chief and a veteran of the War of 1812; his mother was descended from an Iroquois prophet.  Parker received his early education from Baptist missionaries on the Seneca reservation; he later enrolled for a time at Rochester High School.  He quit school at age 18 and devoted his time to furthering Indian affairs in Washington, D.C. During this period, he came to know Lewis Henry Morgan, and helped aid Morgan in his work League of the Iroquois, one of the first studies of an Indian tribe.  In 1852, Parker became the sachem of his tribe and adopted the tribal name Donehogawa, or gKeeper of the Western Door of the Long House of the Iroquois.h  In the late 1850s, Parker studied engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and began to work for the federal government, supervising public works projects.  During one such project he befriended a local clerk, Ulysses S. Grant.  Parker attempted to join the Army at the outbreak of the Civil War, but could not be released from his construction duties until 1862; even then, he could not get an Army commission due to his Indian heritage.  He was finally commissioned as a captain of engineers in 1863, and later that year he became a staff officer under Grant; Grant appointed Parker his military secretary the next year.  Parker was present at Leefs surrender at Appomattox Court House on April 9, 1865 where he took down Grantfs dictation concerning the surrender orders, as he was the only person in the room calm enough to write.  Parker remained as Grantfs military secretary through 1869, eventually ascending to the brevet rank of brigadier-general.  He married Minnie Sackett on December 25, 1867.  Parker was one of Grantfs first political appointments when he became President.  Parker was named Commissioner of Indian Affairs on April 13, 1869. During his tenure in officer, Parker sought to work both for the United States government and the Indians he represented; however, his attempts to bring justice to various tribes over land deals and treaties earned him many enemies in the process.  He was accused of defrauding the government and was tried by the House of Representatives in February 1871.  Although he was exonerated of all charges, Parker resigned from office and went into business in New York City.  He did well in business; later in life, he held various positions within the New York City Police Department.  He died on August 31, 1895.  Two years later, his remains were re-interred at Forest Lawn Cemetery in Buffalo, N.Y. on land that had once belonged to the Seneca tribe.  The collection consists of mostly manuscript material, including approximately 30 letters to or from Ely Parker; legal and business material; two leather notebooks from the 1850s and 1860s; and some items that were removed in January 1972 from the extra-illustrated volume The Life of General Ely S. Parker by Arthur C. Parker.  All correspondence has been indexed.

 

 

Last modified: 9/25/2002